Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì¼¼ Ä¡±Ù´Ü ¼ö¼úÀÇ ¼º°ø°ú ½ÇÆÐ

Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 36±Ç 6È£ p.465 ~ 476
¼Û¹ÎÁÖ, ±èÀǼº,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Û¹ÎÁÖ ( Song Min-Ju ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±èÀǼº ( Kim Eui-Seong ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Á¸°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


In current endodontic practice, introduction of operating microscope, ultrasonic instruments, and microinstruments has induced a big change in the field of surgical retreatment. In this study, we aimed to offer key steps of endodontic microsurgery procedure compared with traditional root-end surgery, and to evaluate factors influencing success and failure based on published articles.
Endodontic microsurgery is a surgical procedure performed with the aid of a microscope, ultrasonic instruments and modern microsurgical instruments. The microscope provides magnification and illumination - essential for identifying minute details of the apical anatomy. Ultrasonic instruments facilitate the precise root-end preparation that is within the anatomical space of the canal. Modern endodontics can therefore be performed with precision and predictability, thus eliminating the disadvantages inherent in traditional periapical surgery such as large osteotomy, beveled apicoectomy, inaccurate root-end preparation and the inability to observe isthmus.
Factors influencing the outcomes of endodontic microsurgery may be diverse, but standardization of procedures can minimize its range. Among patient and tooth-related factors, periodontal status and tooth position are known to be prognostic, but there are only few articles concerning this matter. High-evidence randomized clinical trials or prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Å°¿öµå

Endodontic microsurgery; Periodontal involvement; Prognostic factor; Success and failure; Surgical retreatment; Tooth position

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI